<p/><br></br><p><b> About the Book </b></p></br></br><p>Sima Qian was China's first historian, and his <i>Shiji</i> has been an enormously influential resource to historians, literary scholars, and philosophers. Hardy juxtaposes Qian with the Greek historians, raising important questions about historical "objectivity" and the role of the historian in influencing the present and future.</p><p/><br></br><p><b> Book Synopsis </b></p></br></br>Sima Qian (c. 100 B.C.E.) was China's first historian--he was known as Grand Astrologer at the court of Emperor Wu during the Han dynasty--and, along with Confucius and the First Emperor of Qin, was one of the creators of imperial China. His <i>Shiji</i> (published for Columbia in a translation by Burton Watson as <i>Records of the Grand Historian</i>) not only became the model for the twenty-six Standard Histories that the historians of each Chinese dynasty wrote to legitimize the dynastic succession, but also has been an enormously influential resource to historians, literary scholars, philosophers, and many others seeking an understanding of early Chinese history. In <i>Worlds of Bronze and Bamboo, </i> Grant Hardy presents convincing evidence that the <i>Shiji</i> is quite unlike such Western counterparts as the histories of Herodotus and Thucydides, for, Hardy argues, Sima Qian's work seeks not only to represent but to influence the world in a manner based on Confucian concepts of sageliness and "the rectification of names." <p/>Although many scholars have sought close parallels between Sima Qian and the Greek historians--either criticizing Sima's work, as if Western models of historical interpretation could serve as a template by which to read it, or overemphasizing his "objectivity" to more closely align his text with these "respectable" Greek models--Hardy boldly contends that the Chinese historian never intended to produce a consistent, closed interpretation of the past. Instead, Hardy argues, the <i>Shiji</i> is a microcosm in which Sima Qian sought to represent the open-endedness and multivalence of the world around him, revealing and reinforcing the natural order. <p/>In mapping out this model of the world, Sima embodies the historian as sage rather than chronicler. Transcending mere accuracy in recording events, such a historian seeks not to present an opinion about what happened in the past, buttressed with rational arguments and pertinent evidence, but to penetrate the outer details of an incident and discover the moral truths it embodies. Thus intuiting the moral significance of events, the sage-historian delineates the Way and offers his readers a chance to become more in tune with the natural order. <p/>Illustrating his provocative theses about the <i>Shiji</i> by analyzing Sima Qian's handling of specific historical personages and episodes such as the First Emperor of the Qin, the hereditary house of Confucius, and the conflicts that ended with the founding of the Han dynasty, Hardy both extends and challenges existing interpretations of this crucial yet understudied text and sheds light on its puzzles and incongruities.<p/><br></br><p><b> From the Back Cover </b></p></br></br>UNQUESTIONABLY one of the three or four most important figures from the Chinese past, Sima Qian (C. 100 B.C.E.) cast his shadow across all of Chinese civilization by composing the Shiji -- China's first dynastic chronicle and the archetype for the twenty-five subsequent official dynastic histories. In a bold analysis of this foundational text, Grant Hardy argues that in addition to being a universal history of the entire world (which to Sima Qian was China and its neighbors) from earliest times to Sima's own age, the Shiji also represents a model of the world revealing the inherent patterns of the cosmos. In writing his history Sima Qian's aim was not to present his studied opinions of the past but rather to open up the past itself to the reader, connecting microcosm and macrocosm, and intervening in the world through the performative, ritual functions of language.<P>By thus seeking to understand the Shiji in its own terms and in the context of its own historiographic practices, Hardy offers a distinctive departure from those who approach the work under the rubric of Western principles of history and in the process brings to light many of its previously neglected features.<p/><br></br><p><b> Review Quotes </b></p></br></br><br>Hardys work should become the first book consulted by scholars of the Western tradition who want to know something about Sima Qian and how he is to be positioned with regard to their own historiographic tradition.<br><p/><br></br><p><b> About the Author </b></p></br></br>Grant Hardy is assistant professor of history at the University of North Carolina, Asheville.